MSI MS-16R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 9SCXR
MotherboardMSI MS-16R4  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '22 at 01:31
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 210
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 600
64% 510 Pts
64-Core 607
38% 607 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
MSI(1462 12BD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1165
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.8% Poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 44.3
20% 47.1 fps
MRender 52.1
Gravity 43.8
Splatting 42.2
37% 46 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 890 90 59 102 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 682
Write 880
Mixed 716
SusWrite 346
148% 656 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 57.8
193% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 658
DQ Mixed 401
327% 452 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 130%
Great: 203%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2BE10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 31 32 32 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 112
Write 28.4
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 31.7
40% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 0.43 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI32D4S2S1ME-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 10.3
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R4 Builds (Compare 2,964 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback