ECS H87H3-M3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardECS H87H3-M3  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '22 at 00:46
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 194
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 352
48% 355 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.2% Poor
Lighting 32.8
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 33.1
27% 33.6 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 33.6
Splatting 23.5
25% 31.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 55 54 38 34 34 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.9% Very poor
Read 172
Write 33.5
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 43.9
16% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 3.3
30% 7.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 85%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
108GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 98 98 100 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 121
Write 129
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 98.6
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 77%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
243GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 88 88 87 87 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 88
Write 62.1
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 85.8
53% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.4% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 19.7
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 20.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87H3-M3 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: ECS H87H3-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback