ECS H87H3-M3

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	9.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	ECS H87H3-M3 (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20130610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 02 '22 at 00:42
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	URY-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 93.1 1-Core 93.6 2-Core 183 73% 123 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 349 46% 343 Pts	64-Core 350 22% 350 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26% Poor	Lighting 32.6 Reflection 34.6 Parallax 33.1 27% 33.4 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 33.4 Splatting 23.5 25% 31.5 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 44 50 50 35 37 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	9.8% Terrible	Read 78.1 Write 42.4 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 41.9 10% 45.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 2.9 14% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 9.8% Great: 85%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 115GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 105 105 99 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 120 Write 125 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 103 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.9 185% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 77%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 247GB free Firmware: 2AR10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 88 88 88 87 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 101 Write 69.7 Mixed 55.6 SusWrite 86.5 58% 78.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 77,652 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	61.5% Good	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 19 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 20.3 52% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 61.9 65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87H3-M3 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: ECS H87H3-M3

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	4x
Xeon E3-1220 v3Intel $104Bench 69%, 5,273 samples	3x
Core i5-4440Intel $79Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	4x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	4x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	2x

SSD
860 500GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,934 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	3x
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 M378B1G73BH0-CK0 16GBSamsungBench 50%, 39 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 16,567 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $200

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16