Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131129
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '22 at 18:34
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 563
55% 453 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 12AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 118
Parallax 135
111% 130 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 134
Splatting 109
112% 142 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
691GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 81 80 81 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 444
Write 89.9
Mixed 127
SusWrite 80.4
40% 185 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 22.9
102% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 86.3
DQ Mixed 112
89% 126 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 121%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
333GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 240 238 234 235 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
81.8% Excellent
Read 259
Write 241
Mixed 244
SusWrite 237
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 46.5
155% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 190
143% 191 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 133%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
93GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 39 39 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 37.3
Write 39
Mixed 23
SusWrite 39.4
47% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLB304G08-GGNHM 1315 CT102464BD160B.M16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $331
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback