Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '22 at 18:27
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 131
2-Core 257
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 500
67% 501 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 11C7) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 18.9
15% 20.3 fps
MRender 16.4
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 17.4
14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 89 97 99 110 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 448
Mixed 368
SusWrite 136
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 59.7
204% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 352
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston D48GB-2666 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 11.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2V 2.0 Builds (Compare 657 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $347
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback