Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 224%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '22 at 03:09
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 181
2-Core 356
113% 210 Pts
4-Core 700
8-Core 1,355
122% 1,027 Pts
64-Core 2,422
150% 2,422 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 113%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 4878 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
181% Outstanding
Lighting 258
Reflection 244
Parallax 291
210% 264 fps
MRender 300
Gravity 225
Splatting 174
184% 233 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 181%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDB 256GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 588 485 432 492 420 424 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Amd-raid Array 1 511GB
41GB free
Firmware: 9.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 792
Write 922
Mixed 614
173% 776 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 34.9
158% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 407
DQ Mixed 241
204% 289 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 271%
Sandisk SD9SB8W5 512GB
31GB free
Firmware: X610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 333 178 125 89 68 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.7% Good
Read 373
Write 417
Mixed 188
SusWrite 176
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 26.9
102% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 109
95% 138 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 61.1
MC Write 46.2
MC Mixed 37
137% 48.1 GB/s
SC Read 33.1
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 39.7
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 129%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback