Lenovo 2349TMH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 2349TMH  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2349TMH
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '22 at 23:27
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 149
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 212
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.9
3% 2.9 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 180 181 185 183 182 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 431
Write 192
Mixed 225
SusWrite 178
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 13.7
67% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 29.2
46% 89 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 72%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
141GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 368 372 351 361 366 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 435
Mixed 417
SusWrite 366
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 34.1
110% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 362
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 130%
MSH-128 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: T181222
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 222 231 220 227 228 MB/s
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54% Above average
Read 247
Write 226
Mixed 225
SusWrite 223
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 22.9
79% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 92.3
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 132
100% 132 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2349TMH Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2349TMH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback