Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_TUF506HC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_TUF506HC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HC
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '22 at 15:28
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 80.1
42% 64.3 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 262
24% 201 Pts
64-Core 610
38% 610 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 13FC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 59.1
Parallax 1
5% 22.2 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.7
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Kingmax PCIe SSD 1TB
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMB0.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 503 303 290 282 298 291 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 928
Write 1117
Mixed 955
SusWrite 328
187% 832 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 27.5
134% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 279
194% 246 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 107%
Great: 245%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
70.9% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 21.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 15.7
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_TUF506HC Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_TUF506HC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback