Acer Aspire E5-576

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-576  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Ironman_SK
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '22 at 06:58
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 185
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 284
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ CACHE-SYNAPSE 32GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 58 57 59 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 156
Write 60.1
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 59.4
20% 91 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 14.2
67% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 80.4
DQ Write 59.4
DQ Mixed 70.4
52% 70.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 50%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
2GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 113
74% 113 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBGR/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.6
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-576 Builds (Compare 346 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-576

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback