Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8130U 25,471 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 73.9 1-Core 101 2-Core 179 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 283 38% 283 Pts	64-Core 278 17% 278 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 64%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ CACHE-SYNAPSE 32GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 56 65 65 62 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Read 165 Write 67.8 Mixed 87.2 SusWrite 60.7 21% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 62.2 4K Mixed 14.2 67% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 80.7 DQ Write 67.5 DQ Mixed 74 55% 74.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 50%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 2GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 135 89% 135 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Mixed 0 43% 3.85 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBGR/4G 1x4GB 2,224 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 8.7 28% 9.83 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 9.8 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 92.7 43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	257x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	57x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	32x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	7x
Blue 3D SATA M.2 250GBWD $47Bench 85%, 9,409 samples	7x
Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GBWD $80Bench 97%, 27,087 samples	5x

RAM
ACR16D3LFS1KBG/2G ACR16D3LS1KBGR/4G 6GBKingstonBench 42%, 452 samples	54x
ACR16D3LS1KBGR/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 2,224 samples	34x
ACR16D3LFS1KBG/2G 04CB AO1L16BC4R1-BUES 6GBKingstonBench 43%, 289 samples	27x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16