Medion S15450

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion S15450  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION M15T
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '22 at 23:02
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 71.5
1-Core 146
2-Core 282
89% 167 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 669
73% 577 Pts
64-Core 637
39% 637 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1E39 A025) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9837
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 25
16% 23.1 fps
MRender 18.7
Gravity 25.2
Splatting 16.5
16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
840GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1128 1230 1157 1340 1349 1338 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,506
Write 1,392
Mixed 1,372
SusWrite 1,257
311% 1,382 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 48.5
159% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,034
DQ Write 381
DQ Mixed 883
607% 766 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 218%
Great: 488%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
1TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 81 81 80 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 86.6
Write 78
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 80.9
102% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.8
208% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FE Wilk Elektronik S.A. W-P1N55AA 32GB
2400, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.7% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 20.9
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 17.5
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S15450 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Medion S15450

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback