Acer Veriton M670G/M670

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Acer Veriton M670G/M670 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer EQ45M
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100505
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '22 at 21:42
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170 16,719 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Memory 75.2 1-Core 47.8 2-Core 95.5 47% 72.8 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 191 26% 192 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT 27,834 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 82FD) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.96 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	1.93% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 0.7 2% 1.73 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.93% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 285GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKK1C3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 230 190 23 23 207 MB/s Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.5% Above average	Read 256 Write 240 Mixed 226 SusWrite 146 49% 217 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 46.5 4K Mixed 27.9 97% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 140 119% 173 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 102%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$33 24,309 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 153GB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 83 90 91 91 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 90.9 Write 89.2 Mixed 58.6 SusWrite 88.8 60% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 58%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 16GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 6.7 7.2 13 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	7.14% Terrible	Read 24.7 Write 4.5 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 10.8 14% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.14% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9905403-011.A01LF 0198 9905403-011.A03LF GU512303EP0202 0198 9905458-009.A00LF 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.4% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 6.6 20% 7.03 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 89.9 44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Veriton M670G/M670 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M670G/M670

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	8x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	5x
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	1x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	6x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	3x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	1x
SSD370S 256GBTranscend $123Bench 89%, 11,742 samples	1x

RAM
9905403-011.A01LF 0198 9905403-011.A03LF GU512303EP0202 0198 9905458-009.A00LF 8GBUnknownBench 21%, 4 samples	3x
JM1333KLU-2G 2x2GBTranscendBench 39%, 308 samples	2x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $126

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16