XMG P65_67RSRP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemXMG P65_67RSRP  (all builds)
MotherboardXMG P65_67RSRP
Memory11.9 GB free of 16.0156 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '22 at 16:17
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 184
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 475
50% 403 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 75%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 6B01) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 122
Parallax 6.4
5% 44.8 fps
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8
6% 6.75 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 275 310 294 313 311 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 443
Mixed 369
SusWrite 309
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 51.5
176% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 317
240% 323 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 108%
Great: 122%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 116 110 116 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63% Good
Read 108
Write 106
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 111
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 63%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GigaDevice 25Q Series Kingston KHX2400C14S4/8G Kingston KHX2400C14S4/8G 64GB
0, 2400, 2400 MHz
49152, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 25.9
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 23
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P65_67RSRP Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

System: XMG P65_67RSRP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback