Asrock H310CM-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJan 30 '22 at 12:17
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 75%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 60.8
2-Core 160
59% 100 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 457
50% 396 Pts
64-Core 614
38% 614 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 2506 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
72.3% Very good
Lighting 94.4
Reflection 90.5
Parallax 81.3
77% 88.7 fps
MRender 76.8
Gravity 81.4
Splatting 74.6
63% 77.6 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M8VG 256GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 238 245 256 211 239 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 73% Great: 101%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
188GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 87 79 87 87 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 146
Write 149
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 86.4
127% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
43% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IR2400D464L15S/8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310CM-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback