Asrock H310CM-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '22 at 23:43
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 95.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 245
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 709
71% 579 Pts
64-Core 714
44% 714 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 2554 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Lighting 95.8
Reflection 94.4
Parallax 85.3
78% 91.8 fps
MRender 81.3
Gravity 84.2
Splatting 75.1
65% 80.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M8VG 256GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 267 266 230 188 96 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 73% Great: 101%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
188GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 87 88 88 87 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 141
Write 138
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 88.9
123% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IR2400D464L15S/8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 12.7
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 55.1
72% 55.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310CM-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback