Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '22 at 17:26
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W5580
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 154
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 383
42% 332 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.1% Average
Lighting 62.2
Reflection 62.1
Parallax 84.7
51% 69.7 fps
MRender 61.2
Gravity 64.9
Splatting 46.2
46% 57.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,020
Write 3,639
Mixed 3,678
843% 3,779 MB/s
4K Read 264
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 127
625% 170 MB/s
DQ Read 607
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 467
348% 470 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Team T25 3X6256G 256GB
126GB free
Firmware: U050
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 210 210 211 210 210 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.5% Above average
Read 356
Write 209
Mixed 251
SusWrite 210
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 22.2
85% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 48.2
63% 111 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 11.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback