Biostar B75MU3+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics93.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar B75MU3+  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120301
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '22 at 22:18
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 194
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 509
50% 411 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$291
Gigabyte(1458 37D1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 109
Parallax 112
96% 113 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 104
Splatting 92.9
89% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 185 111 90 65 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.3% Average
Read 180
Write 197
Mixed 182
SusWrite 104
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 25.6
83% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 50.1
DQ Mixed 33.7
27% 37.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 124%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74
433GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 316 338 335 355 394 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 388
Write 375
Mixed 340
SusWrite 319
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 35.3
111% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 36.6
DQ Write 97.1
DQ Mixed 47.6
42% 60.4 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 125%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
316GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 9 9.1 9 9.2 9.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 61.3
Write 8.5
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 9
17% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75MU3+ Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar B75MU3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback