MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics76% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A63
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '22 at 22:18
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 135
2-Core 255
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 727
74% 602 Pts
64-Core 689
43% 689 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 2424) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76% Very good
Lighting 92.1
Reflection 107
Parallax 96.9
75% 98.7 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 93.4
Splatting 95.7
78% 94.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 1TB SSD 1TB
588GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0519A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 421 170 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 517
Write 431
Mixed 411
SusWrite 169
85% 382 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 32.4
146% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 47.3
84% 158 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
212GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 102 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 175
Write 133
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 101
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
647GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 105 107 106 108 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 180
Write 179
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 107
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
172GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 59 58 58 58 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 85.7
Write 126
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 57
67% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.8
194% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 64%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
255GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 123 125 125 125 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 79.7
Write 47
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 123
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 67%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
22GB free, PID c75c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
8.2% Terrible
Read 27.1
Write 7.5
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 12.9
19% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.2%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GF2400C16K4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 22.9
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 25.6
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) Builds (Compare 5,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $762
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback