MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A63
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 19:08
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 131
2-Core 252
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 690
72% 576 Pts
64-Core 698
43% 698 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 2424) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77% Very good
Lighting 93.5
Reflection 109
Parallax 98.6
76% 100 fps
MRender 96.6
Gravity 94.3
Splatting 96.6
79% 95.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 1TB SSD 1TB
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0519A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 333 35 8.5 6.9 9.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 470
Write 366
Mixed 368
SusWrite 136
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 30.7
147% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 47.1
83% 156 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
238GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 111 110 108 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 188
Write 149
Mixed 97
SusWrite 110
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
576GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 153 153 151 154 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 151
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 153
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 114%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
17GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 59 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 52.8
Write 65
Mixed 98.5
SusWrite 57.6
52% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
210% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32%
Great: 64%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
266GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 104 101 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 109
Write 52.4
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 102
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 67%
Mass Storage Device 32GB
4GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 8.7 9.8 10 9.3 9.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
5.75% Terrible
Read 18.4
Write 5.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 8.5
11% 9.32 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
26% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GF2400C16K4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 21.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) Builds (Compare 5,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $762
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback