Lenovo 2394CTO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 2394CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2394CTO
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190909
Uptime14 Days
Run DateJan 28 '22 at 16:36
Run Duration397 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 161
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 433
45% 362 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F5) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4491
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 2.9
3% 4.63 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
3% 4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 500GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,560
Write 4,164
Mixed 4,342
973% 4,356 MB/s
4K Read 270
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 130
650% 180 MB/s
DQ Read 648
DQ Write 401
DQ Mixed 448
354% 499 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 128%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
11GB free
Firmware: GH2ZB550
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 90 91 88 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 63.4
Write 70.3
Mixed 16
SusWrite 90.3
43% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.5
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2394CTO Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2394CTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $595
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback