Estar SugarBay

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemEstar SugarBay  (all builds)
MotherboardESTAR SugarBay
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '22 at 14:20
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 78.3
2-Core 155
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 303
40% 303 Pts
64-Core 300
18% 300 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Device(1027 1976) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4101
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.92% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.1
1% 1.2 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.92%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Cf300 120GB 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0411A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 102 44 48 48 48 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40% Average
Read 230
Write 198
Mixed 193
SusWrite 70.8
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 14.4
81% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 28.5
DQ Write 95.8
DQ Mixed 16.2
26% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown T4G88U1-P9H 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.7% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 13.8
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SugarBay Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Estar SugarBay

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback