| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock AB350M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191225 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 24 '22 at 08:44 |
| Run Duration | 217 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 76% |
PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
45.6%
Average
|
47% 88.8 Pts
|
43% 360 Pts
|
25% 403 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 2175 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.8%
Poor
|
31% 30 fps
|
18% 21.8 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
|
70.9%
Very good
|
79% 27.6 GB/s
|
44% 15.2 GB/s
|
21% 192 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical AB350M-HDV Builds (Compare 388 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock AB350M-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 81x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 43x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 34x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 40x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 33x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 31x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $201 |