Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P  (all builds)
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '22 at 10:29
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 157
2-Core 286
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 865
89% 718 Pts
64-Core 1,073
66% 1,073 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.14
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 23
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 31.6
19% 26.2 fps
MRender 17.8
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 22.8
18% 21.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
500GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1774 1632 1534 1460 1464 1392 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,657
Write 2,562
Mixed 1,875
SusWrite 1,543
484% 2,159 MB/s
4K Read 66.1
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 94
312% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,021
DQ Write 811
DQ Mixed 880
669% 904 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 338%
Great: 372%
WD My Passport 25F3 512GB
15GB free
Firmware: 1012
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 352
Write 301
Mixed 274
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 27.4
89% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 196
148% 200 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
365GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 183 182 182 182 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 158
Mixed 79
SusWrite 179
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
72GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 159 161 169 167 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 94.2
Write 129
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 160
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 90%
Toshiba HDWT140 4TB
22GB free
Firmware: FP1S
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 90 91 74 92 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 130
Write 123
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 87.6
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
568GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 106 109 111 112 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 76
Write 97.1
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 108
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R019D408GX2-3600C18A 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 45.4
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 38.8
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 29.6
SC Write 49.6
SC Mixed 34.8
109% 38 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P Builds (Compare 2,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback