Aftershock N8xxEP6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAftershock N8xxEP6  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock N8xxEP6
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181102
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 27 '22 at 02:17
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 83.9
1-Core 119
2-Core 230
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 711
72% 583 Pts
64-Core 862
53% 862 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8500) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
49.9% Average
Lighting 60.1
Reflection 72
Parallax 61.4
49% 64.5 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 60.9
Splatting 62.9
52% 63.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASE8TNVME256 256GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8TM14.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 82 83 77 70 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 323
Write 83.7
Mixed 174
SusWrite 80.7
36% 166 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 28.5
74% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 82.5
DQ Mixed 142
111% 158 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 115%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB
58GB free
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 67 59 65 62 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 134
Write 123
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 64.2
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.6
226% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-026.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73.8% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 21.3
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 24.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N8xxEP6 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Aftershock N8xxEP6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback