ADD TO PC
BUILD

HPE ProLiant DL325 Gen10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	69.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	HPE ProLiant DL325 Gen10 (all builds)
Motherboard	HPE ProLiant DL325 Gen10
Memory	73.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20181002
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '22 at 22:09
Run Duration	468 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC 7351P 16-Core 29 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Proc 1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Memory 88.6 1-Core 118 2-Core 236 83% 148 Pts	4-Core 474 8-Core 832 79% 653 Pts	64-Core 2,466 153% 2,466 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Gigabyte(1458 36B6) CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.5% Good	Lighting 95.3 Reflection 57.7 Parallax 88.7 78% 80.6 fps	MRender 59.7 Gravity 86.9 Splatting 54 54% 66.9 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 1TB 2,531 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 612GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 410 417 424 426 426 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 116%
WDC WD40PURZ-85TTDY0 4TB 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 116 110 109 108 108 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

HPE LOGICAL VOLUME 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1.66 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1843 242 243 243 241 242 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 65% Great: 120%
Samsung 860 1TB 2,531 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 754GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,818 Write 5,767 Mixed 5,719 1,290% 5,768 MB/s	4K Read 313 4K Write 284 4K Mixed 309 1,022% 302 MB/s	DQ Read 782 DQ Write 690 DQ Mixed 753 560% 742 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2288 115 112 115 112 112 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 465GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 114 106 106 105 106 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HPE 840756-191 8x16GB 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	85.1% Excellent	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 30.5 MC Mixed 28.7 86% 30.3 GB/s	SC Read 22.1 SC Write 32.1 SC Mixed 24.7 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback