Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415FAC_R465FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415FAC_R465FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X415FAC
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 26 '22 at 18:51
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 196
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 179
30% 211 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1D12) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.62% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 3.9
5% 4.67 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 5.8
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.62%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1026 1091 810 774 799 796 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,056
Write 972
Mixed 949
SusWrite 882
217% 965 MB/s
4K Read 67.8
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 69.2
283% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 640
DQ Mixed 516
464% 711 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 218%
Great: 355%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
919GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 129 131 129 128 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 109
Write 100
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 129
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 71%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
443GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 40 39 40 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 30.7
Write 30.5
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 39.6
44% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.4
160% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.2% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 24.4
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 20.3
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415FAC_R465FA Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415FAC_R465FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback