Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 14 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '17 at 12:11
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 123
57% 90.9 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 375
37% 300 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 327.23
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Lighting 27
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 29
22% 26.9 fps
MRender 33.9
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 26.4
23% 28.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
142GB free
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,224
Write 905
Mixed 1,040
235% 1,056 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 47.7
201% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 119
129% 217 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 177%
Great: 254%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 66
Mixed 34.5
41% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.02
4K Write 0.58
4K Mixed 0.04
16% 0.21 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4 KHX1600C9D3/4 KHX1600C9D3/4 F3-12800CL9-2 14GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.9% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.7
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FX-GAMING Builds (Compare 246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback