Oegstone BOAMOT-500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemOegstone BOAMOT-500  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-R
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 25 '22 at 16:16
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 256
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 655
67% 543 Pts
64-Core 657
41% 657 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.1
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 29.6
14% 20.5 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 25.8
Splatting 15.7
13% 15.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 108 124 116 128 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 448
Write 369
Mixed 304
SusWrite 131
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 6
62% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 65.3
DQ Mixed 32.5
40% 71.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BOAMOT-500 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Oegstone BOAMOT-500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback