Lenovo 30DH00G0FR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30DH00G0FR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1048
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '22 at 07:57
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$226
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 147
2-Core 288
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,008
96% 792 Pts
64-Core 1,557
96% 1,557 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
24.7% Poor
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 29.7
Parallax 28.1
26% 29.8 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 30.6
Splatting 25.6
22% 27.6 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LH512HALU-000L7 512GB
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 475 477 476 381 397 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 476
Mixed 435
SusWrite 446
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 49.1
161% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 336
253% 339 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 113%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.5% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 14.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 16
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30DH00G0FR Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Lenovo 30DH00G0FR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback