Fujitsu ESPRIMO D7010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive342% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO D7010  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3823-A2
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '22 at 07:16
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$226
CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 146
2-Core 286
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 1,002
90% 759 Pts
64-Core 1,382
86% 1,382 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.09
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
24% Poor
Lighting 30.7
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 27.7
25% 29.5 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 29.5
Splatting 26
22% 27.2 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_MTFDHBA1T0TDV-1AZ15ABFA 1TB
612GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4MA314
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1901 2182 2220 2205 2227 2084 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 2,403
Write 2,248
Mixed 1,471
SusWrite 2,136
464% 2,064 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 68.3
231% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,168
DQ Write 833
DQ Mixed 1,026
760% 1,009 MB/s
Poor: 172%
This bench: 342%
Great: 343%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2G43AB3-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 11.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO D7010 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO D7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback