Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 98.9 2-Core 188 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 670 61% 513 Pts	64-Core 1742 108% 1742 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250X 12,863 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Lighting 14.6 Reflection 18.5 Parallax 22.7 12% 18.6 fps	MRender 14.3 Gravity 16.3 Splatting 12.5 12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix SC308 S 512GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 433GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 397 397 404 405 403 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Read 392 Write 404 Mixed 264 SusWrite 399 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 32 4K Mixed 21 74% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 218 DQ Mixed 177 142% 199 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 80%
Sandisk X400 2.5 512GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 477GB free Firmware: 2012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 305 295 291 290 291 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Read 465 Write 385 Mixed 315 SusWrite 298 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 41 4K Mixed 27.9 88% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 184 149% 212 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B5173QH0-YK0 8x4GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	MC Read 39.4 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 30.6 97% 33.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 8 27% 9.4 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	99x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	82x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	64x

RAM
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	42x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	39x
M393B1G70BH0-YK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 67%, 378 samples	24x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $316