Dell Precision T5600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Precision T5600
MotherboardDell Precision T5600  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '22 at 00:14
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 61.6
1-Core 99
2-Core 168
62% 110 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 688
62% 522 Pts
64-Core 1,749
108% 1,749 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250X
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 22.7
12% 18.6 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 12.5
12% 14.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC308 S 512GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 406 406 405 408 407 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 398
Write 423
Mixed 267
SusWrite 379
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 22.2
80% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 177
141% 197 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 80%
General UDisk 16GB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 11 12 9.7 11 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Read 11.1
Write 6
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 10.8
11% 8.35 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung-00CE M393B5173QH0-YK0 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
MC Read 57.1
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 28.5
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.7
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T5600 Builds (Compare 897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Dell Precision T5600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback