TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Engage Flex Pro-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Engage Flex Pro-C  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8476
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '22 at 02:08
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 133
2-Core 245
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 809
83% 667 Pts
64-Core 1,064
66% 1,064 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 90.3%
 Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 8476) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8984
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.92% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 9.1
5% 8.47 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 0.3
5% 6.77 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 4.92%
 Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
540GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614600WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1342 1482 1441 1433 1467 1493 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,758
Write 800
Mixed 1,126
SusWrite 1443
286% 1,282 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 67.4
227% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 504
DQ Mixed 633
406% 454 MB/s
Poor: 264% ↑
This bench: 245%
 Great: 573%
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
400GB free
Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1270 1408 1376 1322 1353 1090 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,142
Write 1,201
Mixed 1,077
SusWrite 1303
267% 1,181 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 59.1
196% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 710
DQ Write 450
DQ Mixed 577
431% 579 MB/s
Poor: 122% ↑
This bench: 212%
 Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.4% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 17.6
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 21.6
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 64.4%
 Great: 90%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Engage Flex Pro-C Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Engage Flex Pro-C

CPU
Core i5-8500Intel  $166Bench 82%, 43,089 samples9x
Core i3-8100Intel  $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples3x
Core i7-8700Intel  $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples2x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples10x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples3x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples2x
SSD
Raid 1 Volume 500GBIntelBench 146%, 1,321 samples2x
KBG30ZMV128G TOS 128GBNvmeBench 100%, 36 samples2x
TOSHIBA 128GBKbg30zmv128gBench 91%, 3,266 samples2x
RAM
M378A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 67%, 3,347 samples4x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 43%, 7,364 samples3x
M378A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,582 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $166
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback