Lenovo 82LT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82LT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '22 at 17:00
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 261
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 477
55% 429 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9510
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 20.3
Parallax 24.6
16% 21.5 fps
MRender 17.6
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 16.3
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL1-4D256 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BS262
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 522 209 218 230 230 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1,453
Write 1,106
Mixed 741
SusWrite 301
200% 900 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 99.4
4K Mixed 22.5
132% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 469
362% 503 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 138%
Great: 159%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
63.9% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 18.5
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 15.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82LT Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82LT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback