Acer ConceptD CT500-51A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer ConceptD CT500-51A  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer ConceptD CT500-51A
Memory56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191030
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateJan 24 '22 at 14:22
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 149
2-Core 292
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 1,016
91% 768 Pts
64-Core 1,375
85% 1,375 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 141
Parallax 127
99% 130 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 112
Splatting 121
109% 135 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00007 512GB
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7102Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1052 831 849 834 832 833 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,536
Write 2,160
Mixed 1,737
SusWrite 872
408% 1,826 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 69
230% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 498
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 602
404% 490 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 246%
Great: 293%
Samsung PSSD T7 Touch 2TB
528GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 41 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
4.68% Terrible
Read 22.2
Write 27.3
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 41.5
7% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.3
4% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 191 202 205 203 202 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 126
Write 180
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 200
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
100% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 106%
Seagate M3 1TB
723GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 127 123 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 65.9
Write 141
Mixed 94.7
SusWrite 116
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.7
197% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 64%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 2GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.6 6.3 6.5 6.2 6.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
9.07% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 7
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 6.4
10% 9.23 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.07%
Great: 11%
Ext Hard Disk 2TB
1.5TB free, PID ce33
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 35.6
Write 36.2
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 33.8
47% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
92% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF2G64AZ-3G2E1 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 26.6
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 27.5
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ConceptD CT500-51A Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

System: Acer ConceptD CT500-51A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback