Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	349GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 349GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6238 28 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU0, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 74.9 1-Core 62.2 2-Core 127 53% 88 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 502 45% 377 Pts	64-Core 2,954 183% 2,954 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200 1,717 User benchmarks, average bench 31% HP(103C 1095) ≥ 4GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.47 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Lighting 39.7 Reflection 43.2 Parallax 50.3 32% 44.4 fps	MRender 53.9 Gravity 42.2 Splatting 36.9 35% 44.3 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 34%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD Intel NMA1XBD128GQS Intel NMA1XBD128GQS Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD 159GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16384, 16384, 32767, 32767, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	97.2% Outstanding	MC Read 38.9 MC Write 49.3 MC Mixed 33.7 116% 40.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.7 15% 5.2 GB/s	Latency 90.6 44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 97% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 78%

Battleship

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41141stBench 63%, 670 samples	61x
CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 61341stBench 78%, 153 samples	55x
Xeon Silver 4108IntelBench 60%, 331 samples	31x

GPU
Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 89%, 8,562 samples	102x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples	73x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	70x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	49x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsungBench 250%, 4,056 samples	40x
MZVLB1T0HALR-000H2 1TBSamsungBench 267%, 633 samples	34x

RAM
HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM 12x8GBHynixBench 112%, 37 samples	21x
HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK 4x31.8GBHynixBench 92%, 67 samples	18x
M393A2K40CB2-CTD 4x16GBSamsungBench 80%, 161 samples	17x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16