Biostar H61MGP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar H61MGP  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130930
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 23 '22 at 17:25
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2030-$24
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 128
52% 85.2 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 132
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 138
9% 138 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Biostar(1565 110F) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2817
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.27 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 99 100 97 110 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 71.8
Write 60.3
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 99.3
51% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.7% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MGP Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MGP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback