Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FB_X512FB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FB_X512FB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FB
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210129
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 23 '22 at 17:19
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 219
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 456
51% 402 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX110
Asus(1043 1DFE) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6259
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
6.46% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 7.6
6% 8.43 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 8.1
7% 9.3 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.46%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$54
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1033 509 122 102 71 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,291
Write 1051
Mixed 1,056
SusWrite 327
208% 931 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 67.7
228% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 843
DQ Write 611
DQ Mixed 702
531% 719 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 175%
Great: 239%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 04CD F4-2666C19-8GRS 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 17.6
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 20.1
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FB_X512FB Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FB_X512FB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback