Asrockrack ROMED8-2T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrockrack ROMED8-2T  (all builds)
Memory250.5 GB free of 256 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '22 at 14:24
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7413 24-Core
P0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 51.7
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 127
48% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 510
44% 377 Pts
64-Core 2,674
166% 2,674 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
878GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 317 312 308 368 487 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 483
Mixed 414
SusWrite 350
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 47
163% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 313
235% 313 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 106%
Great: 121%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
2TB free
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3323 3334 3335 3336 3336 3338 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
464% Outstanding
Read 2,728
Write 3,280
Mixed 2937
SusWrite 3,334
695% 3,070 MB/s
4K Read 70.5
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 104
332% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,158
DQ Write 968
DQ Mixed 1,121
824% 1,082 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 464%
Great: 526%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
2TB free
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3324 3315 3290 3335 3335 3331 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
471% Outstanding
Read 2,840
Write 3136
Mixed 2,979
SusWrite 3,322
694% 3,069 MB/s
4K Read 76
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 103
338% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,234
DQ Write 974
DQ Mixed 1,092
821% 1,100 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 471%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A8G40AB2-CWE 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 83.3
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 45.2
159% 55.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 22.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 136%
Great: 228%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROMED8-2T Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrockrack ROMED8-2T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $1,388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback