ECS B75H2-M3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardECS B75H2-M3  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 23 '22 at 03:48
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 181
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 353
46% 345 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 7D8F) 3GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.39% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.39%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 174 152 171 95 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 176
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 136
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.3
246% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 109%
Blackpcs 32GB
27GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.5 2.3 0.5 1.3 1.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Read 19
Write 0.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 1.1
4% 5.58 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
22% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75H2-M3 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS B75H2-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback