Asus ZenBook UX425QA_UM425QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ZenBook UX425QA_UM425QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX425QA
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '22 at 22:25
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Memory 72.9
1-Core 167
2-Core 332
100% 191 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 1065
104% 854 Pts
64-Core 1,360
84% 1,360 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 1852) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Lighting 26.6
Reflection 21.5
Parallax 36.3
22% 28.1 fps
MRender 17.3
Gravity 28.9
Splatting 24
19% 23.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM001TD3JX013N 1TB
643GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1567 1783 1772 1870 1645 1236 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2059
Write 1,830
Mixed 1,512
SusWrite 1,645
396% 1,762 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 70
228% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 954
DQ Write 460
DQ Mixed 1,063
694% 826 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 285%
Great: 338%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 29.6
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 47.5
SC Mixed 31.9
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZenBook UX425QA_UM425QA Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus ZenBook UX425QA_UM425QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback