MSI MS-16L1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GT62VR 7RE
MotherboardMSI MS-16L1  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 15:21
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 219
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 598
60% 485 Pts
64-Core 635
39% 635 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11CF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.05
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.7% Very good
Lighting 83.3
Reflection 158
Parallax 86.2
68% 109 fps
MRender 93.2
Gravity 87.6
Splatting 97.1
76% 92.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000L2 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L1QCXB7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 168 166 165 165 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,273
Write 762
Mixed 532
SusWrite 168
151% 684 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 75.3
269% 97.2 MB/s
DQ Read 866
DQ Write 638
DQ Mixed 347
369% 617 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 178%
Great: 320%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
353GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 460 468 481 442 348 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 437
Write 433
Mixed 432
SusWrite 436
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 65.9
213% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 127%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5663-003.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
75.5% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 24.5
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16L1 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI MS-16L1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback