Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 13:02
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 180
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 333
47% 347 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 240
Dell(1028 210B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
4.96% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 10.7
5% 7.53 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 4.3
5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.96%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 87 81 89 100 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54% Above average
Read 99
Write 93
Mixed 48
SusWrite 89.1
60% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 54%
Great: 61%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
26GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 17 11 17 9.3 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 9.2
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 12.4
16% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 11,704 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback