Dell Precision T3600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Precision T3600
MotherboardDell Precision T3600  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140929
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 20 '22 at 23:57
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 183
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 518
51% 419 Pts
64-Core 680
42% 680 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 146
Parallax 148
125% 149 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 130
Splatting 113
114% 144 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 68 52 61 50 41 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.1% Average
Read 238
Write 120
Mixed 96.8
SusWrite 52
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 20.3
75% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 40.8
DQ Mixed 48.7
48% 79.7 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
833GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 123 142 142 142 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 160
Write 152
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 138
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
238% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 109%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 52 55 53 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 69
Write 55.3
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 53.9
73% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 59%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
552GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 54 56 54 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 106
Write 96.5
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 55.3
106% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 1.1
371% 4.73 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 1.1
411% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 107%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
962GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 44 48 46 47 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
31% Below average
Read 95.8
Write 88.4
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 46.5
95% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31%
Great: 59%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
276GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 42 48 45 47 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 81.9
Write 82
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 45.7
88% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA HDWD240 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 1.7 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 178
Write 164
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 0.6
130% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown-0013 CL9-9-9 D3-1600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
95.3% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 34.9
107% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 93%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,886 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback