Inspur Computer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemInspur Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardInspur Inspur Computer All in one PC
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140626
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 12 '17 at 00:31
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3250
1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 149
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 179
20% 160 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 7DD9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.07% Terrible
Lighting 2.13
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 3.25
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.87
3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.07%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 113
Write 111
Mixed 102
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.42
94% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB
350GB free
Firmware: JEDOA50A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 90.1
Write 88.8
Mixed 83.4
66% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.16
60% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HXMSH2GU03A1F1C-16 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.6% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.8
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Computer Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Inspur Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback