TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsrock 960GM-VGS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '22 at 20:41
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 68
2-Core 128
58% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 188
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 59%
 Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 3625) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 27
Parallax 31.6
19% 27.1 fps
MRender 33.3
Gravity 29.5
Splatting 24.6
23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 20.2%
 Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 126 147 131 135 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 172
Write 157
Mixed 36
SusWrite 134
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 87.5%
 Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 PSD38G16002 12GB
333, 333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 39.9%
 Great: 40%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 960GM-VGS3 FX Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX - $59

CPU
FX-6300AMD  $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples81x
FX-4300AMD  $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples26x
FX-6100AMD  $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples15x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples17x
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples13x
GTX 750-TiNvidia  $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples10x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples12x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples11x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples7x
RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples7x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback