MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '22 at 18:12
Run Duration404 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 90.3
1-Core 149
2-Core 299
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 1018
94% 785 Pts
64-Core 1,511
94% 1,511 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.9% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 118
Parallax 158
87% 128 fps
MRender 93.6
Gravity 113
Splatting 83.2
78% 96.7 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
777GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 611100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,789
Write 4,707
Mixed 3,265
878% 3,920 MB/s
4K Read 79.4
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 104
373% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,461
DQ Write 1098
DQ Mixed 1241
938% 1,267 MB/s
Poor: 228% Great: 595%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
466GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 520
Write 498
Mixed 468
111% 495 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 62
213% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
378GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 520
Write 498
Mixed 474
111% 497 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 63
216% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 109
Write 108
Mixed 74.8
72% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 90.6
Write 84.6
Mixed 56.3
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 47.9
Write 76.4
Mixed 80.9
52% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.9
Write 124
Mixed 67.6
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 95.3
Write 103
Mixed 60.5
64% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
888GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 127
Write 119
Mixed 73.9
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
HP SSD S 700 500GB
466GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 391
Write 95.6
Mixed 75.5
178% 187 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 9.5
1,022% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 17.2
DQ Write 36.2
DQ Mixed 12.5
1,720% 22 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 302%
WDC WD10 EZEX-60WN4A0 1TB
236GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 174
Write 174
Mixed 135
204% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
141% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 64%
WDC WD60 EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 184
Write 164
Mixed 110
188% 153 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 0.7
359% 4.73 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 0.6
348% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 70%
WD easystore 2647 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 128
Write 109
Mixed 77.6
128% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 0.8
313% 3.33 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 11.8
DQ Mixed 0.5
420% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 66%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 970GB
897GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 136
Write 119
Mixed 85.3
140% 113 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 55%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00GXCB0 3TB
632GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 164
Write 169
Mixed 129
196% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
137% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 205
Write 177
Mixed 117
203% 166 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.7
356% 4.77 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 0.6
348% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 70%
WD easystore 2625 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 2625
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 107
Write 91.1
Mixed 70
110% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 65%
WDC WD20 SPZX-11UA7T0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 164
Write 127
Mixed 77.3
146% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.3
176% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
100% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 39.9
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 37
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 100%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $905
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback