Acer Nitro AN515-55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-55  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Stonic_CMS
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210323
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '22 at 01:31
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 130
2-Core 238
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 633
67% 538 Pts
64-Core 610
38% 610 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Acer(1025 143E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
42% Average
Lighting 52.1
Reflection 51.1
Parallax 49.3
42% 50.8 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 47.9
Splatting 43.1
41% 51.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21103900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 784 478 388 359 269 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 972
Write 1639
Mixed 1,098
SusWrite 410
233% 1,030 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 51.2
183% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 998
DQ Write 730
DQ Mixed 807
618% 845 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 159%
Great: 217%
USB30 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 5102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 109 114 115 116 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 82.9
Write 86.4
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 114
66% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.6
156% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905744-076.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
89.1% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 28
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 35.7
SC Mixed 26.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-55 Builds (Compare 15,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback