HP ProDesk 600 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 805D
Memory5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateJan 19 '22 at 21:44
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 199
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 376
53% 389 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 805D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 7.3
5% 8.17 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 6%
AMD Radeon R7 250
Dell(1028 2120) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
6.92% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 13.7
7% 11.1 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 8.4
7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.92%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 311 310 309 306 303 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 326
Mixed 263
SusWrite 310
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 41
166% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 234
198% 291 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 102%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.9% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 1,826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback