Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive477% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211013
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 19 '22 at 19:11
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 184
2-Core 364
111% 211 Pts
4-Core 717
8-Core 1,395
125% 1,056 Pts
64-Core 2,998
186% 2,998 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Gigabyte(1458 4077) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 194
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 168
158% 142 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 140
Splatting 119
120% 151 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 136%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3363 3369 3400 3400 2599 1735 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
477% Outstanding
Read 2,866
Write 2756
Mixed 3,101
SusWrite 2,978
661% 2,925 MB/s
4K Read 83.2
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 119
393% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 1,562
DQ Write 1,064
DQ Mixed 1,256
953% 1,294 MB/s
Poor: 225%
This bench: 477%
Great: 508%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1558 1649 1652 1661 1639 1476 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
362% Outstanding
Read 2,627
Write 1833
Mixed 1,797
SusWrite 1,606
440% 1,966 MB/s
4K Read 68.9
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 97
324% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1590
DQ Write 1,020
DQ Mixed 1,277
960% 1,296 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 362%
Great: 435%
WDC WD60EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 165 166 166 165 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 190
Write 160
Mixed 114
SusWrite 166
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 1.2
76% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 1.5
2% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 39%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
424GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 325 325 324 324 324 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 474
Mixed 461
SusWrite 345
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 43.6
149% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 247
189% 259 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4W.16FE 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
148% Outstanding
MC Read 104
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 36.2
166% 58.1 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 35.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 148%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback